Medea Greek Mythology Essay Example for Free

Medea Greek Mythology Essay Assume control over rebuffing the individuals who have fouled up to her, she is blamed for needing not justiceâ€vengeance. Since I am not a local of neither Corinth nor Colchis, I have my own view about her thought processes. In any case, I would concur with the Corinthian Women, Medea is looking for retaliation; not equity. A few people may contend that Medea is looking for equity. When in fact, Medea needs retribution. The resistance would state equity occurred in light of the fact that the Gods permitted Medea an opportunity to play out her different demonstrations. Despite the fact that these things happened Medea went to retaliation when she volunteered to execute Creon and his little girl Creusa. Indeed, even the tune, the â€Å"ideal spectators†, suggests that Creon is a poor lord when, after he ousts Medea, the First Corinthian Woman identifies, â€Å"I am of Corinth and I state that Corinth isn't very much dominated. †(1. 214-216). This statement gives us verification that Medea has a type of motivation to look for retribution on Creon. Anyway she lets her scorn surpass its limits and permits herself to end the lives of the King of Corinth and its Princess all since they picked Jason over her. What's more, her activities all demonstrate that she needs Jason to accomplish more than pay for harming her. She needs him to endure at the destiny of her own kids. Her retribution was childish. Medea included the two things she knew would hurt Jason the mostâ€her own youngsters. As per the First Corinthian Woman, â€Å"It would be better for you, Medea if the earth opened her jaws and brought you down into murkiness. However, one thing you won't do, for you can't, you won't hurt your own youngsters, however fierceness like plague-bubbles throbs, your psyche in a fire-murkiness nibbles the purple apples of agony. No blood-lapping mammoth of the field, she-bear nor lioness, nor the lean wolf-bitch, harms her own delicate whelps; nor the yellow-peered toward, seythe-curved, and storm bore falcon that tears the sheep has ever constructed prey of the product of her own tree. †(2. 115-126). Remember that the Corinthian Women are the aware of Corinth. Through this statement the First Corinthian Women has expressed that Medea couldn't hurt her own youngsters. She even gives instances of the most risky predators that don’t even mischief their own young. This is proof that Medea went past the condition of equity; yet she went far into the condition of retaliation. Medea comprehended what she was doing and without a doubt she could think less about something besides what she thought of what was looking for retribution on Jason. All in all, retaliation was looked for by Medea. She went over the reality of showing Jason a thing or two; she even expressed she detested Jason more than she adored her kids. Answer this inquiry is what Medea has done engaging or ethically informative?

Definition and Examples of Expeditio in Rhetoric

Definition and Examples of Expeditio in Rhetoric Definition In a contention, the logical term expeditio alludes to the dismissal of everything except one of different other options. Otherwise called elimination,â the contention from residuals, the strategy for buildups, and (in George Puttenhams state) the expedient dispatcher. A speaker or persuader or pleader ought to go completely to work, says George Puttenham, and by a snappy and quick argumentâ dispatch his influence, and, as they are wont to say, not to stand the entire day piddling for no reason, yet to free it off the beaten path rapidly (The Arte of English Poesie,â 1589). See Examples and Observations beneath. Additionally observe: ArgumentationEnumeratioListingLogos Models and Observations End (or expeditio) happens when we have counted the few manners by which something could have been achieved, and all are then disposed of aside from the one on which we are demanding. (Caplan: Cicero, Quintilian, and Aristotle all see this as a type of contention, not a figure. It is referred to in present day argumentation as the Method of Residues.)(James J. Murphy, Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A History of Rhetorical Theory From Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Universityâ of California Press, 1974)Expeditio is the point at which the speaker counts the reasons which may serve to demonstrate something either conceivable or unthinkable, and subsequent to putting aside all the others, chooses that reason which is substantial and indisputable. It is as often as possible utilized in partitions.(George Winfred Hervey, A System of Christian Rhetoric. Harper, 1873) Richard Nixons Expeditio[M]uch all the more remarkable in contention is expeditio, the gadget of setting out numbered alt ernatives and afterward disposing of everything except the one favored . . .. [Richard] Nixon utilizes this end rationale in his discourse advocating military battle in Cambodia, 1970: Now stood up to with this circumstance [supplies originating from Cambodia], we have three alternatives. First we can sit idle. . . . Our subsequent option is to give huge military help to Cambodia itself. . . . Our third decision is to go to the core of the difficulty (Windt 1983, 138). Quite often, the last choice is the favored option.(Jeanne Fahnestock, Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion. Oxford University Press, 2011) Anselm of Canterburys Expeditio: The Origin of Created ThingsMedieval academic scholars likewise endeavored to demonstrate creation ex nihilo by methods for reason with no intrigue to Scripture. A case of this was Anselms discerning contention in his Monologion. He brought up the issue of the birthplace of made things. Sensibly, Anselm offered three potential answers: If . . . the totality of things obvious and imperceptible is out of some material, it must be . . . out of either the preeminent nature, or out of itself, or out of some third pith. He immediately excused the third alternative in light of the fact that there simply is no third embodiment. By procedure of end, this left two prospects. He further excused the likelihood that issue is from itself, thinking: Again, everything that is out of issue is out of some different option from itself and is back to [after] it. But since nothing is other than itself, or back to itself, it follows, in this manner, that nothing is out of itself as material. By procedure of end, this left just a single alternative: The totality of things must exist out of the incomparable nature.(Gregg R. Allison, Historical Theology: An Introduction to Christian Doctrine. Zondervan, 2011) Jimmie Dales ExpeditioTight-lipped, Jimmie Dale gazed out at the dark, flying dividers as the metro train thundered its way back to bring down New York. He had been appropriately done! There could be no doubt about that. Be that as it may, by whom? Also, why? I'm not catching it's meaning? Instinct, even back there in The White Rat, had cautioned him that something wasn't right, however he would not the slightest bit have been defended in being influenced completely by instinct. He couldn't in equity censure himself for that. What right? What was its importance? Something had happened somewherebut not at The White Rat. Also, he had been flawlessly diverted. Every one of that was obvious.Was it Mother Margot? He shook his head. She had never yet betrayed him, and he didn't accept that she would set out to do as such. Indeed, even her visit to the Sanctuary today around evening time, and her apparent healthy regard for the Gray Seal, not to state dread, was practically verification in itself, doubtlessly, she had not intentionally attempted to misdirect him.What, at that point? There appeared to be just a single sensible clarification left. The Phantom. It would not have been through and through another proceed onward the Phantoms part, for, while not entirely similar to, the man had in a way attempted a similar game previously. The Phantom knew very well indeed, and to his cost, that there had been a break some place in his company, a release that had brought the Gray Seal inconveniently behind him more than once.(Frank L. Packard, Jimmie Dale and the Phantom Clue, 1922)

How to Write a Law School Case Brief

Instructions to Write a Law School Case Brief Composing aâ case briefâ can be fairly simple once you’ve got the arrangement down. While this guide concentrates more on the structure of a composed brief, you should keep the majority of the components while doing a book brief too. Peruse a case once before you start instructions, and afterward center around the significant pieces of the case, which will end up being the components of the case brief: Difficulty: Average Time Required: Depends on length of case Here's How Facts: Pinpoint the determinative realities of a case,â i.e., those that have any kind of effect in the result. Your objective here is to have the option to recount to the tale of the case without missing any relevant data yet additionally excluding an excessive number of superfluous realities possibly; it takes some training to select the determinative realities, so don’t get debilitated in the event that you come up short the initial barely any occasions. Most importantly, ensure you have obviously denoted the parties’ names and positions for the situation (Plaintiff/Defendant or Appellee/Appellant).Procedural History: Record what has happened procedurally for the situation up until this point. The dates of case filings, movements of outline judgment, court decisions, preliminaries, and decisions or decisions ought to be noted, yet as a rule this isn’t a critical piece of aâ case briefâ unless the court choice is vigorously situated in procedural princip les or except if you note that your teacher wants to concentrate on procedural history.Issue Presented: Formulate the fundamental issue or issues for the situation as questions, ideally with a yes or no answer, which will help you all the more plainly express the holding in the following area of the case brief. Holding: The holding ought to legitimately react to the inquiry in the Issue Presented, start with â€Å"yes† or â€Å"no,† and expound with â€Å"because†¦Ã¢â‚¬  from that point. On the off chance that the conclusion says â€Å"We hold†¦Ã¢â‚¬  that’s the holding; a few possessions aren’t so natural to pinpoint, however, so search for the lines in the feeling that answer your Issue Presented question.Rule of Law: now and again, this will be more clear than others, yet fundamentally you need to distinguish the standard of law on which the adjudicator or equity is basing the goals of the case. This is the thing that you’ll regularly hear called â€Å"black letter law.†Legal Reasoning: This is the most significant piece of your brief as it portrays why the court managed the manner in which it did; some law educators harp on realities more than others, some more on procedural history, however all invest the most energy in the cour t’s thinking as it joins all pieces of the case abounded in one, depicting the use of the standard of law to the realities of the case, frequently refering to different court’s suppositions and thinking or open arrangement contemplations so as to answer the issue introduced. This piece of your short follows the court’s thinking bit by bit, so be certain that you record it without holes in rationale too. Agreeing/Dissenting Opinion: You don’t need to invest a lot of energy in this part other than the pinpoint the agreeing or disagreeing judge’s primary concern of conflict with the larger part conclusion and basis. Agreeing and contradicting conclusions hold bunches of law professor Socratic Methodâ fodder, and you can be prepared by remembering this part for your case brief.Importance to class: While having the entirety of the above will give you a total brief, you may likewise need to make a few notes on why the case is significant pertinent to your group. Scribble down why the case was remembered for your understanding task (why it was essential to peruse) and any inquiries you have about the case too. While preparation cases is consistently useful, your brief is generally significant with regards to the class that it is for. What You Need Case bookPaper and pen or computerAttention to detail

Free Essays on Law And Order

I accept that there are a few things worth of notice in Zinn’s writings. One of them is the exceptionally quick point of view Zinn has on Law and Justice. At a certain point of the content he offers a conversation starter that left me thinking: where is our more noteworthy commitment, to law or to equity? I emphatically feel that our â€Å"obligation† is both to law and to equity with obligation, monitoring the results of our activities. Equity and law ought to consistently be as one. In spite of the fact that I believe that law and equity ought to be as one, I likewise feel that occasionally it’s inevitable to violate the law so as to accomplish equity. Now and then the lawful framework should be adjusted to current occasions. Because of the extraordinary arrangement of interests of enormous organizations, individuals from the administration, and the intrinsic organization of the framework, the lawful framework doesn't advance into a progressively exhaustive one. This is the reason now and again the law should be broken so as to accomplish equity. At the point when the law is broken, there are sure components that are inescapable to see. Here comes Zinn’s greatest addressing dependent on the weight compliance and insubordination has on law and equity. Zinn says, â€Å"†¦absolute compliance to all laws will abuse equity and sometime lead to huge disorder.† I couldn’t concur more with his announcement. In addition to other things, Zinn gives an entirely reasonable perspective on law and equity. He underpins his announcements with authentic realities that lead us to hopelessness or opportunity by methods for submission or disobedience.... Free Essays on Law And Order Free Essays on Law And Order I accept that there are a few things worth of notice in Zinn’s writings. One of them is the extremely shrewd point of view Zinn has on Law and Justice. At a certain point of the content he offers a conversation starter that left me thinking: where is our more noteworthy commitment, to law or to equity? I emphatically feel that our â€Å"obligation† is both to law and to equity with obligation, monitoring the results of our activities. Equity and law ought to consistently be as one. In spite of the fact that I imagine that law and equity ought to be as one, I additionally feel that occasionally it’s up and coming to overstep the law so as to accomplish equity. Now and then the lawful framework should be adjusted to current occasions. Because of the extraordinary arrangement of interests of large organizations, individuals from the administration, and the inborn administration of the framework, the legitimate framework doesn't advance into an increasingly extensive one. This is the reason some of the time the law should be broken so as to accomplish equity. At the point when the law is broken, there are sure components that are inescapable to see. Here comes Zinn’s greatest addressing dependent on the weight dutifulness and insubordination has on law and equity. Zinn says, â€Å"†¦absolute compliance to all laws will abuse equity and eventually lead to tremendous disorder.† I couldn’t concur more with his announcement. In addition to other things, Zinn gives an entirely reasonable perspective on law and equity. He underpins his announcements with verifiable realities that lead us to hopelessness or opportunity by methods for dutifulness or disobedience....

A perspective about EE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog

A perspective about EE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY - SIPA Admissions Blog I’ve gotten a bunch of questions from newly accepted students about the Energy and Environment concentration. First off, thank goodness you guys are coming! I have nothing but the utmost respect for my colleagues who are willing to dedicate their lives to the energy crisis or solving global warming, because both of those problems scare the heck out of me!   To answer your question, I turned to a braver soul- Risa Edelman, 2nd Year MPA Student and Program Assistant for the Energy and Environment Concentration: specifically in Environmental Policy and Management and Specializing in Applied Science. What were you doing before SIPA? Right before SIPA I was working as a paralegal in international trade law, but I’ve been interested in the environment since I was 4 years old. I used to get in fights with my 4th grade teacher because I wanted write assignments on the empty side of old worksheets in order to save paper.   A friend recently told me she was in her kitchen and noticed she had started turning the water off while washing dishes and exclaimed “damnit Risa” because she knew this was due to my influence. SIPA was my way of making that loving annoyance a real career. Besides the EE concentration how have been involved extracurricularly at SIPA? I am the the former Finance Chair for the SIPA Environmental Coalition. I also do web development for the SIPA Energy Association. We put together a Brown Bag lunch series that included the Executive Director of the NRDC. We also helped plan high a impact career series with the Office of Career Services   to help students interested in transitioning into non-traditional energy and environment careers. What do you do as the Energy and Environment Program Assistant? Well first of, I planned this year’s fall retreat to Surprise Lake. I also organize happy hrs, faculty lunches, and resume workshops as well as extra curricular activities. As the weather gets nicer we are planning a hike and trip to baseball game. Basically my job is to figure out how we can continue to make this a good program and give a good experience to the students we’re serving. I love it. I feel like I get paid to talk to people I would want to talk to anyway. What has been your favorite class in EE Concentration? Sustainability Management with Steve Cohen.   It gives a really good overview of the field of sustainability and forced me to think about sustainability from different perspectives that I would not have otherwise.   I also got a practical skill out of it, policy memo writing.   Sustainability Management counts which is also a management core class, but doesn’t always get listed so make sure to ask! What did you do this summer? I worked for the Sierra Club in DC on their Beyond Oil Campaign. My job was getting students engaged in non-oil solutions and bringing alternative transportation to campuses. I helped students advocate for green transport alternatives recruited a new generation of student leaders. It was an unpaid internship, but I was able to get some funding from SIPA. So tell me about this Earth Summit I’ve heard so much about. Well since you asked, I am helping to organize the 2nd annual Columbia University Earth Summit.   I did the budgeting logistics last year, which was kind of our trial run. This year we hope to make it THE student run enviro event at Columbia. The main event one day conference with panels a discussion groups. It was important to us to plan an event that is solution focused. We didn’t want it to be a conference where people just talk and talk and nothing comes of it.   To help accomplish that goal, we’re hosting a social venture challenge run through the Resolution Project, a separate organization that awards funding and support to innovate student ventures. We’re also running a policy workshop   the day after the summit. Attendees will create a real policy recommendation   to submit to a legislative or deliberative body like the UN.   We’re not   just talking, creating action. What are you most excited about? Jeff Seabrite, the Chief Environmental Officer for CocaCola, is our closing plenary speaker.   I’m excited because it’s so important to work across sectors and to talk about how we can all come together to solve these problems in a sustainable way. Private sector needs to be a leader in that conversation, so I am particularly excited to hear what Mr. Seabrite has to say. Do you need to be a SIPA student to attend? Absolutely not! I would definitely encourage prospective students and anyone else interested to register for the conference here.  You can also volunteer to help at the event by emailing David MacDonald davidmacdonald99@gmail.com. What else should prospective EE students know? I genuinely believe there is no better place to study these issues than at SIPA. Here, you able to get a exposure, not just people you agree with you or who care about these issues but even more importantly to debate and discuss with students who have different priorities. It’s a great time to come to SIPA because the we already run strong programs Energy and Environment, but the University has been investing in these programs at an unprecedented level so we new opportunities are arising and we are   expanding all the time.